Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LYONS v. MENTZER et al
as 5:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. LYONS, SR.
Defendant:
JACK R. MENTZER, JOSEPH M. DITZLER and ELIZABETH TOWN BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOWNS v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2007cv05004
Plaintiff:
DERRICK TOWNS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, EVERETT, KEITH CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARIK (HA-RYK) v. THE GALMAN GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv02326
Plaintiff:
VASYL MICHAEL HARIK (HA-RYK)
Defendant:
THE GALMAN GROUP, INC., TOWN AND COUNTRY TRUST INC., PEARL PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Creveling v. Columbia County et al
as 4:2007cv00661
Plaintiff:
Ryan Creveling and Ryan Creveling
Defendant:
Columbia County, Town of Bloomsburg, James Arter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
