Cases 31 - 40 of 973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Williams, Sr. v. Cuyahoga County Treasurer et al
as 1:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Treasurer, Cleveland Department of Public Works Division of Park Maintenance and Properties and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cluxton v. Pate et al
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
William Cluxton
Defendant:
Darnell Pate, Robert Peters, Mayor Kathi Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Williams v. Cleveland Clinic
as 1:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Mahoning County, et al.
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mary Stone
Defendant:
Mahoning County, William Cappabianca, Kenneth Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023oe01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rozzell v. CSWMFT Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00791
Defendant:
Terence Rozzell, CSWMFT Ohio and William L. Hegarty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
