Cases 31 - 40 of 23,389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Onika Davis
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
The United States of America v. Woodlands at Montgomery LP et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Woodlands at Montgomery LP, Woodlands at Montgomery GP LLC, Kittle Property Group, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Lisa Vollmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
McElroy v. Beyers et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Superior Court Judge Karen Beyers, David Whitman, Kacey Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
