Cases 31 - 40 of 8,694
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bike v. Covetrus, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eric Bike
Defendant:
Covetrus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. City of Senatobia et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Shanterra Jackson
Defendant:
City of Senatobia, Richard Chandler and Willis McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Jackson State University and Eric Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jermille Demoun Johnson and Maggie Denise Jonhson
Defendant:
City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Manuel Santos, Unknown Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
