Cases 41 - 50 of 543
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borougf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Manning et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Manning, Christine Crawford, Keith Manning and others
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chavez et al v. Lennon
as 1:2022cv05924
Plaintiff:
Luz Chavez and Stephen Taylor
Defendant:
Scott Lennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeves , III v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv05799
Plaintiff:
TURNER, REEVES III and Turner Reeves, III
Defendant:
LT. SCOTT, SGT. SULLIVAN, COUNSELOR T. SHERMAN and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05691
Plaintiff:
Tiwon S. Sims
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Officer Brandon Neita-Scott, Star No. 18908 and Officer Victor Alcazar, Star No. 11046
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. Lauer et al
as 3:2022cv50354
Plaintiff:
Stephene Moore and "PM"
Defendant:
Bradley Lauer, The City Of Rockford, Scott Dimke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
