Cases 1 - 10 of 450
Sommers v. Hershberger
as 2:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Sommers and Tessia Kuhlmann
Defendant:
Jacob Hershberger, Richard Myser, Roger Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ellis v. Meigs County et al
as 2:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
Charles Ellis
Defendant:
Meigs County, Donald Scott Fitch, Marty Hutton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon
Defendant:
Scott Kent and Michael P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
A.S. v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
