Cases 91 - 100 of 140
Vianez v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv05272
Plaintiff:
Juan Alexander Vianez
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Federal Detention Center Sea-Tac, Western State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilligan v. Frakes et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edward Paul Gilligan
Defendant:
Scott Frakes , Steven G Hammond , Kenneth Lauren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Van Hinton, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Paulakis et al
as 2:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joshua Andrew Rodriguez
Defendant:
William Paulakis, Kevin Parker, Andrew Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv01042
Plaintiff:
Theodore S. Dale, Jr.
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections , Monroe Correctional Complex , John David Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Robinson et al
as 2:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Randy Gene Robinson
Defendant:
Andrew Martin, Glen Bangs, Joey Gilman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pigott v. Northwest Defenders Association et al
as 2:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stanley Pigott
Defendant:
Northwest Defenders Association, Walter O. Peale, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Feather et al
as 2:2010cv02045
Petitioner:
Andrew Steven Gray
Respondent:
Marion Feather and Robert Lone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lott v. Bales et al
as 2:2010cv01593
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lott
Defendant:
E. Bradford Bales, James Bible, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tisdale v. Nicholas et al
as 2:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hyatt Tisdale
Defendant:
Nicholas and Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
