Cases 101 - 110 of 1,047
Thomas v. Jasso
as 23-40446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Bryan A Smith
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv02677
Plaintiff:
Michael Doc Weaver, Danny Garner and Jimmy Oakley
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, David Reitsma, Tina S. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith Jr v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
Joseph Leonard Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fontenot v. Ernestinen et al
as 4:2023cv02599
Plaintiff:
Chester Gerard Fontenot
Defendant:
Julye Ernestinen and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carty v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Shanon Doyle Carty
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Jim Smith, Tina Vitola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Velasquez et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Clifford Traylor
Defendant:
Emelea Velasquez, Bryan Collier and Kim Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, FNU Hazelwood, A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
