Cases 111 - 120 of 200
Charlton v. Yepez et al
as 2:2016cv00901
Defendant:
Sgt. Arguello, S. Bruning, J. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv00618
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Christopher P. DiGulio, Linda Gruenwald and others
Plaintiff:
Everett James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackburn v. Long et al
as 2:2016cv00570
Defendant:
(Et al), J. Brisco, Changepoint Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Henry Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Hascall et al
as 2:2016cv00476
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, John Doe 1, Debra Hascall and others
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merlina v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Defendant:
B. Carter, Christine Coleman, C. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Merlina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Howard
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Bobby Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenyon et al v. State or Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv02295
Respondent:
County of Multnomah, State or Oregon and Judith L. Swanson
Petitioner:
B. P. K., T. F. K. and Shane Timothy Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
