Cases 111 - 120 of 102,881
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Orange County Courthouse
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
Orange County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leandry v. USA
as 4:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Ismael Leandry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does James V. Allred Unit et al
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does James V. Allred Unit, John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit, John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Warden of FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Francisco Puga Camacho
Respondent:
USA and Warden of FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Collier et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Vedal A Davis
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Anthony Newton and Gynna Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
