Cases 121 - 130 of 2,747
JONES v. JOHN DOE 1-25 et al
as 2:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. JONES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-25 and LT. FUSCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Petitioner:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Respondent:
WILSON and Officer John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAUSO v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES CLAUSO, III
Defendant:
KIESHA FISHER and MAIL ROOM SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. COUNTY OF BERGEN et al
as 2:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERGEN, BERGEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERGEN COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. CURETON et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
BRAD ALLEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY CURETON, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VEGA v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
JOHN M.G. VEGA
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUINONES v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
KEVIN QUINONES
Defendant:
MARABEL RAMIREZ, MATTHEW JORDAN, REBECCA TUNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAAR v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07595
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MARTIN HAAR
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
HAKIM R. NELSON
Defendant:
EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISI v. WIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
PIETRO PARISI
Defendant:
LONNIE WIGGINS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WALKER, MS. G. KLOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
