Cases 121 - 130 of 102,881
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Westerby v. Randall County Parole et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Charles E Westerby
Respondent:
Randall County Parole and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villafranco Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Jesse Villafranco Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Law Library et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
Law Library and Unknown Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Jefferson County Jail
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Baker
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Jefferson County Annex and Jefferson County Jail Mailroom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Chief Roy Finner et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Edward Hicks
Defendant:
Chief Roy Finner, J. Torres and K9 Dog and Handler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Demond Lamont Wilson
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Calvin Abor, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joel Campbell
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
