Cases 171 - 180 of 40,205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Scott v. Freeseman et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Defendant:
Penny Hass Freeseman and Shalena Cook Jones
Plaintiff:
Eric Kelvin Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruth v. Banks County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv00190
Respondent:
Banks County Superior Court
Petitioner:
Jerry T. Carruth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv03604
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Disciplinary Report Board et al
as 1:2024cv03605
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
Lt. Dyke and Disciplinary Report Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Gwinnett County Jail
as 1:2024cv03606
Plaintiff:
Jakale Chandler
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Mastins et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Austin Randy Owens
Defendant:
Cruz, Cpl. Reardon, Sgt Mastins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Mr. Hall, Paul Johnson, Cody Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Trevon DeShon Chapman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SAMPSON
as 4:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
MACOLM J JACKSON
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
