Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff: ANDY NOWELL
Defendant: ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOWELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Petitioner: ANDY NOWELL
Respondent: MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA and ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nowell v. Court System, Russell County, Alabama
as 1:2017cv04076
Plaintiff: Andy Nowell
Defendant: Court System, Russell County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03561
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pruitt v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv04604
Petitioner: Leslie Sean Pruitt
Respondent: Doug Williams, Etowah Sheriff's Department, Alabama, Georgia Governor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridley v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2014cv00164
Plaintiff: EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, DENISE FACHINI, TAMARA SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADSHAW v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2013cv00073
Plaintiff: VICTOR BRADSHAW
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN OWENS, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00008
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wilson v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv02674
Petitioner: Edward Wilson
Respondent: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00015
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?