Cases 11 - 20 of 44,803
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner:
Barry Chester Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Powell v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01457
Petitioner:
James Powell
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Connel
as 3:2024cv01453
Plaintiff:
Villareal James
Defendant:
C/O Connel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01464
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Ryan Hughes, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. McLanahan et al
as 3:2024cv01455
Plaintiff:
Glen Torres
Defendant:
Major McLanahan, L Hanna and Nurse Practitioner Crane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Barkley et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Glen Torres
Defendant:
Officer Barkley, Officer Frye, Nurse Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French et al v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Marcellus French, Allen Ford, Nicholas Ayala and others
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Sterrett, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakey v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Tiffany Clark, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
