Cases 11 - 20 of 4,467
Gotschall v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Robert Gotschall
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosqueda v. Captain Hash et al
as 9:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jose Mosqueda
Defendant:
Captain Hash, Nurse Gabby, Nurse Kelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Slease
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joshua P. Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Slease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrieta v. Anderson et al
as 9:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Eifree Arrieta
Defendant:
Cierra Anderson, Missoula County Sheriff and Captain Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Descharme-Curran v. Butte Detention Facility et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Samuel Descharme-Curran
Defendant:
Butte Detention Facility, Eve Christianson, Mark Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Dixon
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schwalbach v. USA
as 1:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Nicole Marie Schwalbach
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Svoboda v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Emily Ann Svoboda
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hardy v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Caressa Hardy
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Tracey Godfrey
as 9:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
