Cases 21 - 30 of 4,013
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv21975
Plaintiff:
George J. Sebastian III
Defendant:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolton v. Gabriesheski
as 8:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Bolton
Defendant:
Brian Gabriesheski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Joseph A Iozzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRIHIM v. LANGLEY
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM
Respondent:
J LANGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Pierre-Louis
as 2:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Gardner
Defendant:
Officer Pierre-Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Adrian J. Gomez
Defendant:
Antonio Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorman, Bradley v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14155
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dorman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, J. Holtz and Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
