Cases 31 - 40 of 473
Carlton v. Core Civic et al
as 6:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
Core Civic, Kevin Marler, Robert Adams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorval v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Adams Dorval
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Georgia and Warden Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01255
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Pennie v. Adams
as 1:2023cv01151
Petitioner:
Ntyono A. Pennie
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pennie v. Adams
as 6:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Ntyono A. Pennie
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRUTCHLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jermaine Fuller
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams and Deputy Warden Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE CLAY
Defendant:
Nurse ADAM MARTIN and CHARLES COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NORMAN O GLENN
Respondent:
WARDEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crutchley v. Lowndes County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Crutchley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Jail and Southern Health Partners Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
