Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Havard v. USA
as 1:2018cv00213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Adam Havard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
David Adams
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baez-Gil v. Adams County Correctional Center
as 5:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Angel Baez-Gil
Defendant:
Adams County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County MS et al
as 5:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County MS, Adams County Circuit Court, State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Board of Supervisors
as 5:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Board of Supervisors and Travis Patten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Elijha T. Hall
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept., Travis B. Patten and Tony Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Metro Narcotics et al
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Metro Narcotics, Adams County Sheriff Dept. and Walter James Mackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept., Walter James Mackel and Matthew "Will" McConnelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 5:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept. and Tony Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkton v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Pinkton
Defendant:
Lepher Jenkins, Barbara James and Marshall County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
