Cases 31 - 40 of 1,256
Jones v. Woodruff
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woodruff
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Shaun Jones
Defendant:
Rogers State Prison and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lewis Majors
Defendant:
Warden Joshua Jones, Deputy Warden of Security ILLA, Lieutenant Tullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallmon v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hallman and Derrick Hallmon
Defendant:
Warden Otis Smith, Captain Jones and Sabrina Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Odum
as 1:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Kemp et al
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rogers
Defendant:
Gov. Kemp, Commissioner Oliver, Stan Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
