Cases 31 - 40 of 1,356
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 7:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Deputy Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Superintendent
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Clarence Evans
Defendant:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Titus
as 1:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
United States Ex Rel Karl Gooden
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caruso v. Lamanna et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Caruso
Defendant:
Superintendent Amy Lamanna and Dr. Christopher Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazzeo v. Superintendent
as 9:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
David Mazzeo
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Samuelson
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Jinja J. Kyng Pariah Johnson
Respondent:
Superintendent Samuelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Green Haven Correctional Facility, Superintendent Miller and ORC A. Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Latona et al
as 6:2023cv06735
Plaintiff:
Clint Edwards
Defendant:
Superintendent L. Latona, Poff, Lieutenant Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Safran v. Superintendent
as 2:2023cv09485
Petitioner:
David Jeffrey Safran
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01618
Petitioner:
Willie Jennings
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
