Cases 31 - 40 of 10,878
Romero v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Albert Andrew Romero
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Susan Campbell and Robert Nogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Union City Community Corrections Center
as 5:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mendenhall
Defendant:
Union City Community Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewton v. USA
as 6:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Dallas Tyler Ewton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downey v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Johnie D Downey
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
George J. Sebastian III
Respondent:
United States of America, Merrick B Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burdex v. Turnkey Medical et al
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical, Oklahoma County Commissioners and Vicki Zemp Behenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Oklahoma County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Demetric Hooper
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee McCullough
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Amanda Honeycutt, Molly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
