Cases 31 - 40 of 17,271
Vaughan v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
Warden Keith Arnold, Asst Warden Bethany Cornchia, Chief of Security Ronald Stotler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stitely v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fooks, Jr v. Warden of Patuxent et al
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Anton Fooks, Jr
Defendant:
Warden of Patuxent and Corizen Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracy v. Hakim et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Petitioner:
Terance A Tracy
Respondent:
Kakia Hakim and Attorney General for Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Warden of W.C.I. et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Petitioner:
Darrius Jordan
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Achimbi v. Owoeye
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Brannon Achimbi
Defendant:
Officer Owoeye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, Ndze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01493
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
