Cases 41 - 50 of 214
MACDONALD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv04518
Defendant:
SGT. RAGIOLA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUFF and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK M. MACDONALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRA v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2021cv00028
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
DARWIN RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. ORTIZ
as 1:2020cv12352
Petitioner:
WEST RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
DAVID E. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALI v. BAHR et al
as 1:2020cv03834
Defendant:
WARDEN, ELIZ. DET. C ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, DIR. ICE MATTHEW ALBENCE, SEC. DHS CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
ERIKA DALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2019cv20906
Defendant:
DET. DANIEL CHOE, PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DET. JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIAR ROJAS CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv20490
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19246
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BAR ASSOCIATION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
