Cases 41 - 50 of 376
Ingram v. Cheetham et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
R. C. Cheetham, FNU Clements, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SALADEEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2022cv00115
Petitioner:
TERRY SALADEEN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALLARD v. SILVERMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
TERRY NATHAN SILVERMAN and JEREMY KRIESEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Terry Alonzo Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Garnto v. Florida Department Of Corrections Secretary et al
as 2:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Terry L. Garnto
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections Secretary, Attorney General of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Cole
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Carteraun, JFRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawls v. Hayes et al
as 8:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Terry T. Rawls
Defendant:
Cami D. Hayes and Sharon Caserta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Cunzo et al
as 2:2022cv14066
Plaintiff:
Terry T. Pullen
Defendant:
Paul Cunzo, Thayer and Fort Pierce Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Bauer et al
as 2:2022cv14009
Plaintiff:
Augustus Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Dan Lewis Vaughn, Michael Carlton Heisey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
