Cases 51 - 60 of 152
Jacobs v. Fillipi et al
as 1:2018cv11505
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Jacobs
Defendant:
Joeseph Fillipi, Cheshire County Department of Corrections, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eze v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv11310
Plaintiff:
John O. Eze
Defendant:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Endeavor Capital Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Santos v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv12184
Plaintiff:
Joshua Santos
Defendant:
Joseph M. Murphy, Correctional Officer Trout, Lieutenant Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. Turco et al
as 1:2017cv12044
Plaintiff:
DaSheem LaShawn James Dew
Defendant:
Thomas A Turco, III, Steven A. Silva, Oswaldo Videl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spatig v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv11023
Plaintiff:
Max Spatig
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, Fort Devens Federal Medical Center, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartel v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv10990
Plaintiff:
Cory Bartel
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, John Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv10946
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, John Does, Lt Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2017cv10666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky, Ivanoff, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker et al v. City of Lowell
as 1:2017cv10633
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Booker
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Penrose, Dokos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
