Cases 51 - 60 of 440
Hill v. Fisher
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
Richard Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Amonda Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephenson
Defendant:
Carlene Davis, Angel Quiros, Kristine Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Commissioner et al
as 3:2022cv00465
Petitioner:
Charles C. Williams
Respondent:
Commissioner, Cotta and Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beatty et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Teresa Beatty, Michael Llorens and Karl Weissinger
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and William Tong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Correction
as 3:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltas v. Dones et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Alexandro Dones, Gervacio Negron, Yavuz Usluca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tugie et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Plaintiff:
Francis Anderson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Tugie, William Mulligan, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
