Cases 61 - 70 of 1,215
Mendez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00917
Petitioner:
Juan Albert Mendez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Snellings v. Garcia et al
as 6:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
Juan Garcia, Angela Johnson, ., Evelynn C. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Darrington Unit
as 4:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Darrington Unit, Major Frederick Gooden, Sgt Oki Bey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. USA
as 3:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Juan Diego Cervantes
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martinez v. Perez et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Martinez
Defendant:
Martin Perez, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Donald Blaine Davis
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bean v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Bean
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Juan J. Nunez, Wayne Douglas Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Juan Rafael Rosario
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castoreno v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Christopher Castoreno
Respondent:
Juan Garcia and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Nunez
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Juan J Nunez, J.D. Mireles and Rosalinda Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
