Cases 61 - 70 of 120,739
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Nixon v. Morales
as 2:2024cv01531
Petitioner:
Brandon Nixon
Respondent:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ramsom v. Lucy et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Plaintiff:
Donshea Lavon Ramsom
Defendant:
Lucy, Phipps and Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Inyo
as 2:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Monterey
as 2:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Monterey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Inyo
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Inyo County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01559
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Inyo County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
