Cases 71 - 80 of 120,739
(PC)Bonilla v. County of Inyo
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
County of Inyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Inyo County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01559
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Inyo County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Tulare County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Tulare County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01578
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jzon Edward Buckner v. U.S. Marshal Fresno
as 5:2024cv01166
Petitioner:
Jzon Edward Buckner
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Fresno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calvin Maron Robinson v. J. Rupp et al
as 2:2024cv02843
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
J. Rupp, A. Moreno, E. Rojo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Banks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Eric Banks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
