Cases 81 - 90 of 50,119
Pearson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03943
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson
Defendant:
State of New York, O.C.J. Officer #039, C.O. T. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tejera v. John Doe 1 Lieutenant et al
as 1:2024cv03820
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tejera
Defendant:
John Doe 1 Lieutenant, John Doe 2 Police Officer, John Doe 3 Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. OBCC
as 1:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
OBCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janczuk v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv03655
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
USA and USA-SDNY Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Song v. Virgil
as 1:2024cv03820
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Song
Defendant:
Scott Virgil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rosales-Garcia v. Howard
as 2:2024cv03662
Petitioner:
Ovidio A. Rosales-Garcia
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradbury v. City of Montpelier, VT et al
as 1:2024cv03848
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Bradbury
Defendant:
City of Montpelier, VT and Montpelier, VT Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03859
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gonzalez
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer John June, Correctional Officer John Randazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
