Cases 1 - 10 of 1,624
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
C Jones, D. Luke, FNU Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Dixon
as 8:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derousseau v. Winter Haven Police Dept. et al
as 8:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Chenel Derousseau
Defendant:
Winter Haven Police Dept., Michael Kelly, Bruce Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Stravious B. v. Brady et al
as 2:2024cv14150
Plaintiff:
Stravious Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
John Brady, Archie Jeriaine Lasolomon, Nathanniel Stubley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mansukkani et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Davante Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Mansukkani, FNU Harr, FNU Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Neel et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
C. Neel, C. Burnett, Nunes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
