Cases 1 - 10 of 36
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HURLEY v. RAHILL et al
as 3:2023cv04327
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HURLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE KIMARIE RAHILL, PROSECUTOR ALYSSA MANDERA, VITA S. MENNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGARTH v. TURNER et al
as 1:2023cv03933
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCGARTH
Defendant:
SIS TURNER, CASE MANAGER MCCOY, SIS VALASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONHEENEY v. PRETRIAL SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2022cv04826
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CONHEENEY
Defendant:
PRETRIAL SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY, OCEAN COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARTHURS v. N'DIAYE
as 1:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
BRADLEY ARTHURS
Respondent:
LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRURY v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
as 1:2021cv15409
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DRURY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, LISA RENEE MILLS, BRADLEY KAUFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2020cv02277
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
STEVEN BRADLEY MELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MORILLO v. BRADLEY
as 2:2019cv13672
Respondent:
P. BRADLEY
Petitioner:
DISLENIA MORILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BYRD v. FINLEY et al
as 3:2019cv06879
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT MARK GILLEN, THE DAILY JORNAL VINELAND NEW JERSEY, DETECTIVE MICHAEL FRANSKO and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
