Cases 1 - 10 of 228
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twitty v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Gregory M. Twitty
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harrison v. Arnold et al
as 0:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Krystal Arnold, Zachary R. Parsons, P.A. Gregory Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sobin v. Lanham et al
as 4:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Sobin
Defendant:
Lt. Lanham and Sgt Deno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County et al
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney's Office of Clay County, Gary Gregory, Harold Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney's Office of Clay County, Gary Gregory and Harold Rader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. United States
as 6:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Davis
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VanDemark v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Gregory Alan VanDemark
Respondent:
Fed. Bureau of Prisons and David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shields v. McKenzie
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Shields, Sr.
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nutter v. Wyatt
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gregory Nutter
Defendant:
Lt James Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
