Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Beal v. Greenman et al
as 4:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Camarion Beal
Defendant:
Andrew Greenman, Sam Dotson, Gregory Klipsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Wren et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Brandon Carl Gregory
Defendant:
Margaret Wren and Charles Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Hancock
as 2:2023cv04165
Petitioner:
Rickey Lee Hopkins
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00994
Petitioner:
Rickey Lee Hopkins
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Terrell Reed
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisden v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Quincy Baisden
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Thomas May
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
