Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Walker v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Gregory Robert Walker
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Burger et al
as 3:2021cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Detective Travis Ian, Multnomah County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Steven Boston, Naima Chambers-Smith, Theresa Swart and others
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downs v. Brown
as 3:2020cv02257
Respondent:
Anna J. Brown
Petitioner:
Gregory Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derkach v. Randall et al
as 6:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Medical-Mental Health Misty, T. J. Reasons, P. Bichsel and others
Plaintiff:
Vitaliy Derkach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Lane County Parole and Probation et al
as 6:2019cv01661
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Lane County, Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory John Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Molaski v. Gower et al
as 6:2019cv01075
Defendant:
Craig Prins, Gregory Ross, Mike Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Molaski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sako v. State of Oregon
as 3:2017cv02036
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and State of Oregon
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Gregory Thomas Sako
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siefken v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv01930
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Petitioner:
Gregory Siefken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01695
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, Michael Gower, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
