Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shaw v. Northern NH Correctional Facility
as 1:2022fp00164
Petitioner:
David Shaw
Respondent:
Northern NH Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Covington v. NH State Prison, Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00330
Defendant:
FNU Picone, FNU Lemay, NH State Prison, Warden and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
James Covington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
as 1:2019cv01122
Petitioner:
John Shaw
Not Yet Classified:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2018cv00806
Respondent:
Paula Mattis, Jeffrey Meyers, Christine Santaniello and others
Petitioner:
Noel Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shaw v. USA
as 1:2016cv00197
Petitioner:
Joel Shaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Towle v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Towle
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH State Prison, Warden and Dan Shaw
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bernard et al v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2007fp00327
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, Tim Moquin, FNU Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
