Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2024cv00917
Defendant:
Honorable Richard A Miller, Kevin Buchanan, Trace Briggs and others
Plaintiff:
Herman T Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Webb
Defendant:
Lopez, Richard Williams, Sgt. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Garfield Co Court House et al
as 5:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Tom Newby, Shawn Hill, Garfield Co Court House and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 5:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Burchett v. Bates
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Burchett
Respondent:
Tom Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Pettigrew
as 4:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Wayne L Allen
Respondent:
Tom Bates and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston et al v. City of Bartlesville Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Tom Holland, Steven Silver, Bartlesville Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Pouncil and Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Bates et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt, Mark Knutson, FNU Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Clardy et al
as 6:2020cv00471
Defendant:
Kevin Clardy, Citytellacoin, Tom Pittman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Ray and Eric Shawn Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
