Cases 1 - 10 of 510
Sier v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Sier
Defendant:
Detention Officer Dotson, Detention Officer Roberts and Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Donell Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00264
Defendant:
Lopez, Steven Harpe and Richard Williams
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Bixler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Webb
Defendant:
Lopez, Richard Williams, Sgt. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Truong et al
as 5:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Vicki Behenna, Emily Grossnicklaus and Cindy H Truong
Plaintiff:
William Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Williams et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Respondent:
Rick Williams
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00623
Defendant:
Roger Reeves and Cory Armfield
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and William C Rankins
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
