Cases 1 - 10 of 2,932
Jalees v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv05186
Petitioner:
Mohammed Jalees
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Jose Catalan-Avila.
as 1:2024cv04825
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Catalan-Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Rossini
as 1:2024cv04798
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Albert Rossini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Clay
as 1:2024cv04217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carleous Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04078
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patrick v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04075
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
