Cases 1 - 10 of 50,120
Johnson v. City of Rochester, NY RPD et al
as 6:2024cv06355
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Johnson
Defendant:
City of Rochester, NY RPD, Officer ID# ROC 1847 and Officer D. Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04341
Plaintiff:
Robert Pearson
Defendant:
State of New York, Orange County Jail, Wellpath Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04312
Petitioner:
Demark Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Artis v. Baez et al
as 1:2024cv04376
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee Artis, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. A. Baez, C.O. W. Acton, C.O. B. Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn et al v. Olaniyan et al
as 1:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gunn
Defendant:
Olatokunbo Olaniyan, Elizabeth Geddes, Maria Cruz Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Doty et al
as 9:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Knight, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Doty, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Jane/John Doe
as 1:2024cv04281
Petitioner:
Pedro Jimenez
Respondent:
Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Latimore v. Clinton County
as 1:2024cv04276
Petitioner:
Theodore Latimore
Respondent:
Clinton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
