Marine Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Tow Tell Marine Services, LLC v. M/V 28' Spencer, et al
as 13-15893
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOW TELL MARINE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: M/V 28' SPENCER, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, equipment and all other necessaries appertaining and belonging in rem and MARTIN PILAFIAN, in personam
St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc. v. That certain unnamed 1997 31 foot Cruisers, MC No. 2859RL, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, equipment and all other necessiaries appertaining and belonging We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv15027
Plaintiff: St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc.
Defendant: That certain unnamed 1997 31 foot Cruisers, MC No. 2859RL, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, equipment and all other necessiaries and belonging and Renee Clous
Abraham Wallace, et al v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 12-15347
Plaintiff - Appellee: ADRIAN NASH, GLENFORD PALMER, ABRAHAM WALLACE, each on their own behalf, and on behalf of all other current and former employees of Norwegian Cruise Lines Limited similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant: NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Abraham Wallace, et al v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15204
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABRAHAM WALLACE, each on their own behalf, and on behalf of all other current and former employees of Norwegian Cruise Lines Limited similarly situated, GLENFORD PALMER, ADRIAN NASH and others
Defendant - Appellee: NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Inacio Lobo, et al v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-13623
Plaintiff - Appellant: INACIO LOBO, on behalf of himself, and all other current and former employees of Celebrity Cruises, Inc. similarly situated, JOHN GOMEZ, JOAO RODRIGUES and others
Defendant - Appellee: CELEBRITY CRUISES, INC. and FEDERAZIONE ITALIANAN TRANSPORTI
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Kriel et al
as 6:2010cv01169
Plaintiff: CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant: Charles William Kriel, Pamela Anne Kriel, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Type: Contract Marine
Sugeng Priyanto, et al v. M/S Amsterdam, et al
as 10-55485
Plaintiff - Appellant: SUGENG PRIYANTO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general and AGUS EKO SUYANTO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general
Plaintiff: MIRANDA ADENI, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general and INDRA SUKMANA PUTRA KUSUMA
Defendant - Appellee: M/S AMSTERDAM, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N.V., Erroneously Sued As Holland America Line Inc. and HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC
Romano Marcella, et al v. Holland America Line N. V.
as 09-55693
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROMANO E. MARCELLA, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general and BALTAZAR A. RAFALES, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general
Defendant - Appellee: HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N. V.
USA v. M/V Sanctuary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2123
Party-in-Interest - Appellee: USA
Plaintiff: MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION and STATE OF MARYLAND CENTRAL COLLECTION UNIT
Defendant - Appellant: M/V SANCTUARY, her engines, tackle equipment, boilers, furniture, and all other necessaries therunto appertaining and belonging, in rem, POTOMAC NAVIGATION, INCORPORATED and PROJECT LIFE, INCORPORATED
Claimant: JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
Rogers, et al v. Royal Caribbean, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-55071
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL ROGERS and HULYA KAR, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated seafarers and as private attorney general
Defendant - Appellee: ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINE and M/V MONARCH OF THE SEAS
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE and SEAFARER BENEFIT FOUNDATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?