Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Qingdao Zhongfu International Logistics Co., Ltd. v. Hop Wo Intl Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Qingdao Zhongfu International Logistics Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Hop Wo Intl Trading, Inc., Yat Wo Trading Inc., Yao Hua Li and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Shenzhen Long King Logistics Co., Ltd v. Hop Wo Int'l Trading, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv10682
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Long King Logistics Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Hop Wo Int'l Trading, Inc, CEO Yaohua Li and Yaohua Li
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
In re: RLB Contracting Inc.
as 4:2019cv03529
Defendant:
Limitation of Liability, Ricardo Rodriguez and Jose Jusino
Petitioner:
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF RLB CONTRACTING, INC., AS OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THE JOHNATHON KING BOYD, ITS ENGINES, GEAR, TACKLE, ASSOCIATED VESSELS, ETC., FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LI
In Re:
RLB Contracting, Inc.
Claimant:
Additional Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
OEC Freight (NY) Inc. et al v. KT Superwin Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv03072
Plaintiff:
OEC Freight (NY) Inc. and OEC Group New York Inc.
Defendant:
KT Superwin Corp. and Li Chu Chou Chien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
IN RE M/V MSC FLAMINIA
as 1:2012cv08892
Claimant:
NEK, Olmuska International Paper, Norevo GmbH and others
Counter Defendant:
Pirelli Tyre s.P.A, TI Automotive, Stanley Logistics Centre and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Society A-N Auto Import Export, Consortium Cargo, BMW Group Plant 2.7 and others
Cross Defendant:
Savory Paper (25), Weylchem US Inc., Ekol Ofset A.S. and others
Cross Claimant:
Zenda Diensteinstungen Gmbh, UAS "JURVISTA", Palm Paper Limited and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Trouw Nutrition USA. LLC, HartFord Fire Insurance Company and Electrotechnica Arteche Hermanos
Counter Claimant:
Stolt Tank Containers BV, Hellmann Worldwide Logistics S.A. de C.V., Sea Shipping Line and others
Lead Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Poland S.P. Zoo, Panalpina World Transport Ltd., Ahlers EDC and others
Plaintiff:
NSB Niederelbe Schiffahrtsgesellschaft MBH & Co. KG, Ace Seguros S.A. and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
3Rd Party Defendant:
BDP International, Inc., Panalpina Inc., BDP International, N.V. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
BASF Corp., et al., Stolt Tank Containers B.V., Suttons International Ltd. and others
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
Ocean Container Line, Inc. and Nippon Denko Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Horizon International Shipping, Inc. v. Rani Alasmar et al
as 3:2010cv01148
Plaintiff:
Horizon International Shipping, Inc.
Defendant:
Rani Alasmar, Hani Al-Ibrahim and K-Li-Dad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd v. Asia Power Shipping (HK) Ltd
as 1:2009cv04451
Plaintiff:
Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd and Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd
Defendant:
Asia Power Shipping (HK) Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Brantley et al v. Pacific Pioneer Shipping, Liberia et al
as 2:2009cv03006
Plaintiff:
Robert Brantley, Jr., Robert Brantley, Jr., Chad Buras, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Pacific Pioneer Shipping, Liberia, Pacific Pioneer Shipping, Liberia, Pacific Pioneer Shipping, Liberia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tongli Shipping Co., Ltd. Samoa v. Tianjin Teda Hengyun Commerical & Trading Co. Ltd., et al
as 1:2008cv10756
Plaintiff:
Tong Li Shipping Co. Ltd. Samoa
Defendant:
Tianjin Teda Hengyuan Commercial & Trading Co. Ltd. and Tianjin Tianbao International Show & Trade Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd v. J-Rui Lucky Shipping HK Co. Limited
as 1:2007cv06093
Plaintiff:
Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd and Shanghai Hong Li Shipping Co. Ltd
Defendant:
J-Rui Lucky Shipping HK Co. Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
