Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ha v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 5:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Sally Ha
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Cutright v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 2:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Judith Cutright
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Barclay
as 3:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Marc T. Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Southern Wisconsin Emergency Associates, S.C. et al v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Southern Wisconsin Emergency Associates, S.C. and Specialty Billing Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Southern Wisconsin Emergency Associates, S.C. v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2011cv00687
Plaintiff:
Southern Wisconsin Emergency Associates, S.C. and Specialty Billing Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curiel et al
as 2:2009at01761
Plaintiff:
Pedro Curiel and Maria Curiel
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. DBA HomeQ Servicing, Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Old Republic Default Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Curiel et al vs Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv03074
Plaintiff:
Pedro Curiel and Maria Curiel
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Old Republic Default Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
ACP Master Ltd. et al v. CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv08144
Plaintiff:
ACP Master Ltd., ACP Master Ltd., ACP Master Ltd. and others
Defendant:
CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC, Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
