Cases 11 - 18 of 18
PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC v. CASTILLO et al
as 2:2019cv12469
Defendant:
SEBASTIAN CAICEDO, KARLA MERCEDES, MICHAEL WALDT and others
Plaintiff:
PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC D/B/A MOMENTUM SOLAR and PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC
SANDMAN v. AMBRUS et al
as 3:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. SANDMAN
Defendant:
ROBERT AMBRUS , FORTIS LUX FINANCIAL, ABC CORPS 1-5 and others
Cross_claimant:
ROBERT AMBRUS
Cross_defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and FORTIS LUX FINANCIAL
Counter_claimant:
ROBERT AMBRUS
Counter_defendant:
DENNIS J. SANDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanact, Inc. v. U.S. Pipelining LLC
as 1:2016cv00377
Defendant:
U.S. Pipelining LLC , John Does 1-5, Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Sanact, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Lynn Dorsten, et al v. Columbia Pacific Income Fund I
as 15-15107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY LYNN DORSTEN, STEVEN J. SCHWARTZ, M.D., RICHARD E. WARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COLUMBIA PACIFIC INCOME FUND I
CARRICO v. KRAFT et al
as 2:2015cv07767
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CARRICO
Defendant:
STEVE KRAFT , JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hache v. Barclays Bank PLC et al
as 1:2015cv07358
Plaintiff:
Ramon Manuel Hache
Defendant:
Barclays Bank plc , John Doe's 1-100, Jane Does (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorsten et al v. SLF Series G, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv61235
Plaintiff:
Mary Lynn Dorsten , Steven J Schwartz, MD , Richard E. Ward IRA and others
Defendant:
SLF Series G, LLC , Pompano Waterway Development , Secured Lending Fund, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hache v. Barclays Bank PLC et al
as 1:2014cv06115
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC, Business Entities (LLC, Partnership and Corporation 1-100), Jane Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Manuel Hache
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
