Cases 1 - 10 of 31
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-55209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and XAVIER BECERRA, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 23-55157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Mercy General Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mercy General Hospital, Regional Medical Center of San Jose, also known as Alexian Brothers of San Jose, Inc., formerly known as Alexian Brothers Hospital, AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center, also known as Anaheim Memorial Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL & UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
Secretary XAVIER BECERRA and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, MILLS-PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER, MEMORIALCARE ORANGE COAST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Enloe Medical Center et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv09278
Plaintiff:
County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems-Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino doing business as Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital, a California Limited Partnership doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kaweah Delta Health Care District et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv06564
Plaintiff:
Marin General Hospital, Pasadena Hospital Association, LTN doing business as Huntington Hospital also known as Huntington Memorial Hospital, County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems - Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
