Medicare Act Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 170
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff: BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff: JACOBI MEDIAL CENTER, LINCOLN MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, NORTH CENTRAL BRONX HOSPITAL and others
Petitioner: NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff: ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a Hillcrest Medical Center doing business as HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH DEER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH JOHN C. LINCOLN MEDICAL CENTER doing business as SCOTTSDALE LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN HOSPITAL-NORTH MOUNTAIN doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN NORTH MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL doing business as SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. et al v. BECERRA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv03902
Plaintiff: ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC., AMH HEALTH PLANS OF MAINE, INC., AMH HEALTH, LLC and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA and CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Battle Creek Health System, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5310
Plaintiff: Battle Creek Health System, Chelsea Community Hospital, Holy Cross Hospital and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States, Department of Health and Human Services
Mast Enterprises, LLC et al v. Total Renal Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Defendant: DaVita, Inc., Total Renal Care, Inc., Renal Life Link, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mast Enterprises, LLC and Star Plus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, et al
as 23-3915
Plaintiff / Appellant: MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC and MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS SERIES 44, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., et al
as 23-1820
Plaintiff / Appellant: MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company, MSPA CLAIMS 1 LLC, a Florida limited liability company and SERIES PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, a Delaware series limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., a New York for proifit corporation, d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, FRESENIUS USA, INC., a Massachusetts for-profit corporation, FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC., a Delaware for-profit corporation and others
Interested Party: FRESENIUS GRANUFLO/NATURALYTE DIALYSATE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?