Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Tuerpe v. Slootman et al
as 5:2024cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuerpe
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
GU v. WANG et al
as 3:2024cv04348
Plaintiff:
DING GU
Defendant:
PETER ZUGUANG WANG, RAYMOND WANG, MING ZHAO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jones
Defendant:
Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Abramowski et al v. Nuvei Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Pawneet Abramowski, Amanda Abrams, AG Mortgage Value Partners Master Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Nuvei Corporation and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc.
MILIOTE v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILIOTE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN and others
WEISS v. MOYNIHAN et al
as 2:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WEISS
Defendant:
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN, FRANK P BRAMBLE, SR. and others
WEISS v. MOYNIHAN et al
as 3:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WEISS
Defendant:
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN, FRANK P. BRAMBLE, SR. and others
REYNOLDS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED 04/08/2015, v. Schwab et al
as 4:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED
Defendant:
Charles R. Schwab, Walter W Bettinger, II, Peter Crawford and others
Not Classified By Court:
The Charles Schwab Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan
Defendant:
John F. Young, Anthony K. Anderson, Linda Jojo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
