Cases 1 - 10 of 18
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz et al
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Defendant:
Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corporation, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Parekh v. Avalara Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Vineet Parekh and Martin Sohovich
Defendant:
Avalara Inc, Scott Mcfarlane, Bruce Crawford and others
Saracino v. Ruckelshaus et al
as 2:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
Mark Saracino
Defendant:
William J. Ruckelshaus, Eric M. Emans, Andrew M. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diphilipo v. Ballmer et al
as 2:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Stephen Diphilipo
Defendant:
Steven A. Ballmer , Dina D. Dublon , William H Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barovic v. Ballmer et al
as 2:2014cv00540
Plaintiff:
Kim Barovic
Defendant:
Steven A. Ballmer , Dina D. Dublon , William H. Gates III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weinstein v. Kirkman et al
as 2:2013cv00769
Plaintiff:
Richard Weinstein
Defendant:
Robert L Kirkman, Julie M Eastland, Christopher S Henney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2013cv05332
Plaintiff:
Richard Weinstein
Defendant:
Robert L Kirkman, Julie M Eastland, Christopher S Henney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Assion et al v. Zillow, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Klaus Assion
Defendant:
Spencer M. Rascoff , Chad M. Cohen , Richard N. Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Richman v. Dunham et al
as 3:2011cv05921
Plaintiff:
Steven Richman
Defendant:
Brian Dunham, Stephanie Welty, William R Tagmyer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01824
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ann Bartlett
Defendant:
Richard William Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
