Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bayer CropScience, et al v. Stearns Bank National Assoc.
as 15-1967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bayer CropScience, LP, Bayer CropScience Holding, Inc., Bayer CropScience, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Texana Rice Mill, Ltd., Texana Rice, Inc., Eagle Lake Rice Dryer, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stearns Bank National Association
Bayer CropScience LP et al v. Texana Rice Mill, Ltd. et al
as 4:2013cv02375
Plaintiff:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc. , Bayer Cropscience LLC and others
Defendant:
Texana Rice Mill, Ltd. , Texana Rice, Inc. , Eagle Lake Rice Dryer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Stearns Bank NA v. Saya Hospitality LLC
as 4:2013cv00828
Plaintiff:
Stearns Bank NA
Defendant:
Saya Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Schuler et al v. Stearns Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2013cv00508
Plaintiff:
Ed Schuler and Skip Berg
Defendant:
Stearns Bank, N.A. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Meritage Homes of Nevada, Inc. v. FNBN-Rescon I, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01425
Defendant:
FNBN-Rescon I, LLC and Stearns Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Meritage Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Citrus El Dorado, LLC v. Stearns Bank
as 12-55311
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITRUS EL DORADO, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
STEARNS BANK
Citrus El Dorado, LLC v. Stearns Bank, et al
as 11-57123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITRUS EL DORADO, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
STEARNS BANK and FNBN RESCON I LLC
Citrus El Dorado, LLC v. Stearns Bank, et al
as 11-55196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITRUS EL DORADO, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
STEARNS BANK and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Stearns Bank v. Crestmark Bank
as 1:2008cv00105
Plaintiff:
Stearns Bank, Stearns Bank and Stearns Bank
Defendant:
Crestmark Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
